GROW

Grateful Recovering Online Women

2018 Business Meetings

Previous | Index

Business Meetings - October 2018 or April 2018


Business Meeting – October 2018



Business Meeting Welcome

Greetings, and welcome to the October 2018 Business Meeting of Grateful Recovering Online Women (GROW).

I am danna, a recovering alcoholic, and your Business Chair for this meeting. Thank you for participating!

This is a closed meeting, open only to members of GROW, for the discussion of business as it relates to our group. Our business meetings run in four-day segments and last no more than 29 days.

I will post each Agenda item, one by one, in separate emails and **ask that you respond to each accordingly.** This makes it easier to "tally" the responses and suggestions to each item. We will have a three-day period of open discussion on each Agenda item. This, hopefully, will allow all members regardless of work schedules, time zones, etc. to participate and comment. At the beginning of the fourth day, I will post the results/consensus of our discussions.

Before we begin, let's have a moment of silence to reflect on why we are here, followed by the Serenity Prayer.

God, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, courage to change the things I can and the wisdom to know the difference. Amen.

In this Business Meeting, let us be guided by The Twelve Traditions:

  1. Our common welfare should come first; personal recovery depends upon A.A. unity.
  2. For our group purpose there is but one ultimate authority -- a loving God as He may express Himself in our group conscience. Our leaders are but trusted servants; they do not govern.
  3. The only requirement for A.A. membership is a desire to stop drinking.
  4. Each group should be autonomous except in matters affecting other groups or A.A. as a whole.
  5. Each group has but one primary purpose--to carry its message to the alcoholic who still suffers.
  6. An A.A. group ought never endorse, finance or lend the A.A. name to any related facility or outside enterprise, lest problems of money, property and prestige divert us from our primary purpose.
  7. Every A.A. group ought to be fully self-supporting, declining outside contributions.
  8. Alcoholics Anonymous should remain forever nonprofessional, but our service centers may employ special workers.
  9. A.A., as such, ought never be organized; but we may create service boards or committees directly responsible to those they serve.
  10. Alcoholics Anonymous has no opinion on outside issues; hence the A.A. name ought never be drawn into public controversy.
  11. Our public relations policy is based on attraction rather than promotion; we need always maintain personal anonymity at the level of press, radio and films.
  12. Anonymity is the spiritual foundation of all our traditions, ever reminding us to place principles before personalities.

Let us all keep in mind our Unity of Service statement from the Grapevine of September 1998:

"Unity seldom means that we all agree on everything. Nor is unity served by setting aside our concerns and conforming to the majority opinion (or the vocal minority) . . . Unity is best achieved by a full hearing of all points of view . . . time for all of those involved to step back from emotional responses . . . as well as careful consideration and prayer for that which will best serve the group or AA as a whole."

Thank you for being here and for your dedication to GROW.

Respectfully submitted, danna M. GROW Business Chair


Top of October 2018 Business Meeting | Top of Page



Business Meeting Agenda - October 2018

Greetings GROW Members:

The October 2018 Business Meeting (GROW-BUS) is now open. If you wish to participate, please send an email to the following address requesting to join the Business List grow-owner@oso-aa.org - if you have not already done so.

PLEASE:

Agenda for October 2018 Business Meeting

Trusted Servant Reports:

In the October 2018 meeting, an ad hoc committee began developing and implementing a new GROW website. Our first business will be to receive and discuss the workgroup's progress to date and talk about next steps (Proposal 1).

In addition to GROW's website, participants in this meeting will consider several proposals:

I look forward to your participation at the meeting!

Respectfully submitted, danna M. GROW Business Chair

Top of October 2018 Business Meeting | Top of Page



2018 Group Inventory - Responses to Questions

Question 1. What is the basic purpose of the group?


Question 2. What more can the group do to carry the message?


Question 3. Do new members stick with us, or does the turnover seem excessive?


Question 4. Do we emphasize the importance of sponsorship? How effectively? How can we do better?


Question 5. Are we careful to preserve the anonymity of our group members and other A.A.'s outside the meeting rooms? Do we leave the confidences they share at meetings behind?


Question 6. Do we take the time to explain to all members the value to the group of following our guidelines of e-mail etiquette? As a member, am I familiar with and do I follow these guidelines?


Question 7. Are all members given the opportunity to speak at meetings and to participate in other group activities?


Question 8. Are we mindful that holding office is a great responsibility not to be viewed as the outcome of a popularity contest, are we choosing our officers with care?


Question 9. Does the group do its fair share toward participating in the purpose of A.A. - as it relates to our "Three Legacies" of Recovery, Unity and Service?


Question 10: As a group, do we remain informed about AA as a whole? Do we support, in every way we can AA as a whole or just the parts we understand and approve of?

Question 11: Are we considerate of all our members?


Question 12: As a group, have we done a thorough and fearless inventory, or have we missed an important element?

Top of October 2018 Business Meeting | Top of Page



Mini Steering Committee Report - October 2018

The "mini" Steering Committee (Chair, Secretary, and Listkeepers) dealt with two incidents in the last six months. Both of them involved differences of opinion between two members and were settled quickly. Neither incident was directly related to GROW operations or AA traditions.

Respectfully submitted, danna M. GROW Business Chair

Top of October 2018 Business Meeting | Top of Page



Secretary’s Report - October 2018

Outgoing trusted servants


Incoming trusted servants


Current Trusted Servants as of October 2018

Our Trusted Servants:


Trusted Servants who make up the Steering Committee:

Top of October 2018 Business Meeting | Top of Page



Listkeeper's Report - October 2018

Our membership as of September 27, 2018 is 364. Regular list members 323 and 41 Digest members (this number is always a little larger than our actual count because some members have two subscriptions - one for regular posts and one for digests and some members have two regular list addresses).

This time last year we had 319 members. We are GROWING!

Karen and I have been working together for a few years in various capacities and have a great working relationship!

Our Greeters, Laurie and Gigi are doing an excellent job and we all enjoy working together!

Respectfully submitted, Karen H and Nancy C, GROW Listkeepers

Top of October 2018 Business Meeting | Top of Page



Treasurers Report - October 2018

Donations
Balance from April 2018 $142.07
PayPal donations to GROW $214.65
Ally - check donations to GROW $160.03
Total donations $516.85

Distributions
GSO TBD*
Dean Collins / oso-aa.org TBD*
Grapevine $0
International exchange fees $0.80
Prudent Reserve $122.00
Total distributions TBD*

Total donations $516.85
Total distributions TBD*
Final balance TBD*

*A proposal is being considered that would change the amount paid to oso-aa.org, which would affect the amount distributed to GSO.

Respectfully, Sue W. Treasurer

Top of October 2018 Business Meeting | Top of Page



GSR Report - October 2018

The current issue of Box 459, Summer 2018, has some touching articles and some informative articles.

The cover article tells the story of getting the Big Book translated into Navajo, which is an oral language. Many dedicated people kept the project going for years to insure an accurate translation in the native language. It's an inspiring read.

There is information on openings for Trustees, an informative piece about myths and misconceptions concerning outside interests in AA, medical, judicial, treatment. The General Service conference is summarized with recommendations put forward there.

There are 2 requests from AA members to share for the development of 2 new pamphlets, one for Spanish speaking women and one for experience concerning the 3 legacies of recovery, service and unity.

As always there is a list of AA functions, mostly in the US, but a few outside as well.

Box 459 is available online.

Joan B. GSR

Top of October 2018 Business Meeting | Top of Page



Grapevine Representative (GVR) Report - October 2018

I have been Grapevine Rep (GVR) for 12 months. Each month I've sent out one email containing the Grapevine topic for the month and various other AA/Grapevine announcements.

At the last Business Meeting we agreed that the Grapevine topic could be better highlighted and this does seem to have encouraged more sharing from Grow members on the monthly topic.

I always copied and pasted an article related to the topic in full at the end of my GVR email. This is permitted by Grapevine as it's us sharing it with our group. Feedback seems to show that Grow members appreciate having the story there in full to read.

I have always felt some of the Grapevine announcements get a bit lost in the monthly topic meeting email, and it was my intention to send out a second email just for these; however, I didn't but I've passed that on as an idea in my handover of the service position to the incoming GVR.

also discovered towards the end of my term that there is a handbook or set of guidelines available to GVRs. It is on the Grapevine website and I've emailed a link to it for the incoming GVR. I found it really useful to read about the history of the magazine, the format, how it carries the message and how it's a recovery tool and the explanations as to why things are in it, I definitely recommend we continue to inform future GVRs that these guidelines are there.

Final thought... there's a lot of audio available through the Grapevine website! Worth checking out if you have a subscription.

Thanks for letting me serve as GVR.

In love and service, Sophie

Top of October 2018 Business Meeting | Top of Page



OIAA Representative's Report - October 2018

Hi, I'm Jenny, an alcoholic and your group representative at the Online Intergroup of Alcoholics Anonymous.

OIAA is the global intergroup for online meetings of all kinds. Members are from all over the world and they provide the first line of communication for people seeking help/info/meeting information via the web. There is a very active 12th step committee; for every request for help they receive, over three responses are sent to the individual questioner.

Most members, including GROW, participate in the monthly role call by saying a little about their online meeting such as format, number of members, etc. Participation throughout the month is spotty and often includes a lot of cross talk. The last 6 months of meetings have been difficult for me to "attend" simply because there is so much frustration being vented.

Sometime before April, the previous treasurer absconded with the treasury (approx. $3,000). As a result, funds are low and tensions are high. Incoming funds are low, willing servants are hard to find, and some of the "old timers" are angry about it (and not afraid to say so). Part of the frustration is that without participation, OIAA may cease to exist. Full disclosure: I do not hold a service position at OIAA.

There is a monthly topic meeting (Tradition and concept) which while somewhat educational and informative still has all the above issues.

Thank you for letting me be of service.

Jenny P. OIAA Representative

Top of October 2018 Business Meeting | Top of Page



Business Meeting Discussion

Top of October 2018 Business Meeting | Top of Page



First 3-Day Period

During the first 3-day session, participants discussed the first three of nine proposals. These proposals addressed:


Proposal 2.1 - FYI Letter Change

Five people commented on the proposal to delete "d. Website Information" from the table of contents of the FYI letter, all agreeing with it. We will vote on Proposal 2.1 in the next 3-day period. This change was based on the fact that no website information currently appears in the letter. Website information is included in the Listkeeper Letter. During the second 3-day session, participants will vote on whether to adopt the proposal as a Group Conscience Decision.


Proposal 3.1 - "Let It Stay Here" addition to Weekly Meeting Format Letter

Twelve (12) particiants commented on the proposal to add a sentence to emphasize AA's anonymity principle to the Weekly Meeting Format Letter. The sentence "Who you see here, what you hear here, when you leave here, let it stay here" between the Preamble and "How It Works." A couple of participants felt the new language was not necessary. One person raised the question of whether we should enforce this principle if a member violated it. No one responded to this query.

Two participants suggested changes to the wording of the insert, and those who commented expressed approval of the changes. Therefore, the Chair incorporated these two changes into a revised Proposal 3.2a upon which we will vote in the second 3-day session. The first would change the word "hear" to "read" to reflect the online nature of our meeting. The second would clarify what we mean by "anonymity" with an additional sentence: "(Anonymity refers to personal information and personal issues - not the message of recovery.)"

When it was revealed that The Weekly Meeting Format Letter already contains a similar sentence (penultimate paragraph of the format), participants generally felt the same message should not appear in the letter twice. Therefore, the Chair prepared a second version of the proposal upon which we will also vote in the second 3-day session. Proposal 3.2b would delete the current penultimate paragraph ("Anonymity Statement: Please remember that "Anonymity is the spiritual foundation of all our traditions, ever reminding us to place principles before personalities." What you hear here and who you "see" here, let it stay here."


Proposal 4.1 - Increase Contribution to oso-aa.org

Eight (8) participants commented on the proposal. While there were some questions, in the end there was consensus supporting the proposal. In the next 3-day period, we will vote on the proposal as presented during the second 3-day session.


Respectfully, danna M GROW Business Chair

Business Meeting Discussion
Top of October 2018 Business Meeting | Top of Page



Second 3-Day Period

During the second 3-day period of the business meeting, we announced the results of voting on the first three proposals and discussed three proposals presented at the end of the first 3-day session.

Results of Voting
Results of Voting on Proposal 2.1 - Change FYI Letter

Fifteen (15) participants in favor, and no one voted against Proposal 2.1. Therefore, it is adopted as as a unanimous Group Conscience decision:

Group Conscience Decision:
Delete item d. (Web Page Information) in the GROW FYI CONTENTS section of the FYI Letter sent out by the Secretary each month.

Results of Voting on Proposal 3.2 - "Let it Stay Here"

Proposal 3: Add the reminder to the Weekly Meeting Format Letter (between the Preamble and "How It Works") to emphasize the principle of anonymity in our meetings: "Who you see here, what you hear here, when you leave here, let it stay here."

In response to comments, the Chair presented two versions of the proposal. The first version (3.2a) reflected suggested edits to the recommended language that met with general approval. The second version (3.2b) contained the suggested edits as well as the deletion of a similar line (the penultimate paragraph) of the current Weekly Meeting Format Letter. Participants were asked to vote on one of the two versions (indicating an automatic "I disagree" vote for the other version).

Four (4) participants voted in favor (25%), and 12 voted against Proposal 3.2a. Therefore, the proposal did not meet the requirement for a 2/3 majority vote in favor of the proposal.

Twelve (12) participants voted in favor (75%), and four (4) voted against Proposal 3.2b. Therefore, Proposal 3.2b met the requirement for a 2/3 majority vote in favor of the proposal.

Before we can adopt Proposal 3.2b as a Group Conscience decision, the participants who voted against it will have the opportunity to express their "Minority Opinion" during the third 3-day period of the Business Meeting. If no one wants to submit a Minority Opinion, the proposal is adopted. If a Minority Opinion is submitted and one participant decides to change their vote, we will vote a second time on the proposal, giving all participants the opportunity to change their vote. Minority Opinions are invited for submission during the third 3-day period of the Business Meeting.

Results of Voting on Proposal 4.1 - Contribution to oso-aa.org

Eighteen (18) participants voted in favor, and no one voted against Proposal 4.1. Therefore, it is adopted as a unanimous Group Conscience decision:

Group Conscience Decision:
Increase the monthly contribution to Dean Collins (oso-aa.org) to reimburse him for any time and effort to support GROW's website, particularly the new website WordPress configuration. Double the current contribution from $12 per month ($72 for six months) to $24 ($144 for six months).

Recommended Language:
Change the sub-bullet in the Treasurer's job description to reflect the increase:

$12.00 $24.00 monthly to OSO-AA (PayPal: dean.collins@insightplanners.com) (6 months expenses)

Summary of Discussions
Comments on Proposal 5.3 - Newcomer Committee

Eight (8) participants commented on Proposal 5.2 creating a Newcomer Committee to support the Temporary Mentor.

The Trusted Servants who jointly proposed the creation of a Newcomer Committee explained their reasoning as to why it was important and how the committee would operate. Our current Temporary Mentor shared her experience with a portion of newcomers who have tried without success to get a sponsor based on our "Available Online Sponsor" webpage, reporting their queries were not answered timely or at all. Given that some newcomers need a lot of guidance and support, the Temporary Mentor sometimes finds the position overwhelming and could use the support of women who themselves are new to AA's program in answering questions and supporting women brand new to sobriety.

The committee would be informal, something like the 12th Step List, with members who volunteer and are not Trusted Servants. This gives women with less sober time the opportunity to be of service while also building a strong foundation for their own recovery. The Temporary Mentor would lead the group.

Most of the women who commented on this proposal supported the idea and appreciated the explanations given by the current and immediate past Temporary Mentor. One member suggested that there should be a requirement for a minimum of three months to be on the committee. Others cautioned against overwhelming our new members with too much information too soon. In the third 3-day session, we will vote on Proposal 5.3 as presented.

Comments on Proposal 6.3 -TM & AA Resources
Six (6) participants commented on the proposal for the Temporary Mentor to send links to AA resources (AA, OIAA, Grapevine) to newcomers and to send these links to the larger GROW group each month as a reminder. Comments were generally positive, although some offered additional resources (like AA's GSO and AA-approved literature like the Big Book, 12x12, and Living Sober). As with Proposal 5.2, a couple of participants cautioned against overwhelming people with too much information at one time, suggesting more packets of information would be more effective. In the third 3-day session, we will vote on Proposal 6.3 as presented.

Comments on Proposal 7.3 - Abolish OIAA Representative Position
Thirteen (13) women commented on the proposal to abolish the Trusted Servant position of OIAA Representative. Comments both supported and opposed the proposal, and many participants asked questions about the impacts of withdrawing our representative from OIAA.

Supporting the proposal, several women who had held the OIAA Rep position confirmed that their experience had been one of frustration with OIAA's lack of organization and contentious meetings. OIAA Rep resigned her position and welcomed any replacement who could overlook the chaos and confusion in OIAA that we have experienced for 15 years.

Several women agreed with withdrawing from OIAA with a few caveats:

Several women felt that GROW's participation in OIAA is important for a variety of reasons that include:

A couple of participants asked about the OIAA Rep position in relation to GROW's GSR who also serves as a contact with the larger AA organization. (The Chair points out that all references to OIAA were removed from the GSR job description in an April 2018 Group Conscience decision. Unfortunately, the changes to job titles and descriptions have not yet been made on GROW's website.) During the third 3-day period, we will vote on the proposal as presented.

New Proposals to be Discussed during the Third 3-day Period
Three new proposals were presented for discussion by meeting participants:

Proposal 8 addresses follow-up on the 2018 Group Inventory:

GROW's Steering Committee will review the comments made in response to the 2018 Group Inventory questions and, where appropriate, make recommendations for changes that would reflect the group's feedback.

Proposal 9.3 calls for seting aside one meeting each month as a Step Meeting:

Grow will allocate the first weekly meeting each month as a Step meeting. The Weekly Lead Listkeeper will identify the date of the first Sunday each month when asking for volunteer leads, naming the corresponding Step (eg, January = Step 1) as the topic for that week. Grow will continue to have a Tradition as a monthly topic, sent out by the Weekly Lead Listkeeper as per current Grow conscience/guidelines.

Proposal 10 seeks to improve GROW's handling of announcements about oneline sponsors and to establish a Beginners' sub-meeting to run parallel with our main meeting:

GROW will better support newcomers to our group and to AA. This will involve a two-pronged approach:

In order to assure that newcomers have access to a sponsor, GROW will: Discontinue GROW's webpage "Available Online Sponsors" (http://www.g-r-o-w.com/members/ts/sponsor.htm). The GROW members on that list will work with the Temporary Mentor to assure that newcomers who want a sponsor are assigned a temporary Sponsor. To further support newcomers to the AA program, GROW will Open a closed beginners' meeting similar to how we are running the biz meeting.

Participants will discuss these three proposals during the third 3-day period of the October 2018 Business Meeting.

Respectfully, danna M GROW Business Chair

Business Meeting Discussion
Top of October 2018 Business Meeting | Top of Page



Third 3-Day Period

During the third 3-day session, we voted on three proposals, discussed three new proposals, and received a Minority Opinion that reopened discussion on Proposal 3 ("Let It Stay Here").

We voted on three proposals:

We discussed three new proposals:

We also received a Minority Opinion related to voting on Proposal 3 - "Let It Stay Here." As a result of the Minority Opinion, four women decided to change their vote. Therefore, we will further discuss the proposal and minority opinion during the fourth 3-day period and have a revote during the 5th 3-day period.

During the fourth 3-day period of the October 2018 GROW Business Meeting, we will talk about the proposed new WordPress-based GROW website, vote on Proposals 9 and 10, discuss Proposals 11 and 12, and re-visit Proposal 3 on adding the "Let It Stay Here" anonymity statement in the Weekly Meeting Format Letter.

Voting
Proposal 5.3 - TM & Newcomer Committee

Sixteen (16) participants voted in favor (80%), and four (4) voted against Proposal 5.3. Therefore, the proposal meets our requirement for a 2/3 majority is adopted as a Group Conscience Decision.

Group Conscience Decision:
To expand on the Temporary Mentor by establishing a Newcomer Committee, as the Sponsorship pamphlet suggests some groups do. That committee could be rapid-response for new members much as the OIAA link for "Get Help Now" is. The only requirement could be much less sober time, giving our newer members an opportunity to share their experience, strength and hope.

Proposal 6.3 - TM & AA Resources
Nineteen (19) participants voted in favor, and no one voted against Proposal 6.3. Therefore, the proposal meets our requirement for a 2/3 majority is adopted as a Group Conscience Decision.

Group Conscience Decision: Each month, the Temporary Mentor will send a short letter reminding GROW members of AA resources available to them. She will also include the recommended language in Temporary Mentor Letter #1.

Proposal 7.3 Abolish OIAA Rep Position
Ten (10) participants voted in favor (56%), and eight (8) voted against Proposal 7.3. We did not meet the requirement for a 2/3 majority vote in favor of the proposal. Given that this proposal has been discussed before recently with the same outcome, the Chair will not ask for the Minority Opinion.

Proposal 7.3 is therefore set aside and cannot be revisited for one year.

Discussion
Proposal 8 - Group Inventory Follow-up - Withdrawn

During the 3-day period, it was revealed that there were already instructions within the Group Inventory guidelines for the business meeting to take appropriate actions to address any issue raised in Group Inventory responses. Therefore, the proposal was withdrawn. Many of the proposals on our agenda already address these issues, and the review of responses was completed within 24 hours.

Proposal 9 - Step Meeting as Topic 1st Week of Month
Thirteen (13) participants commented on Proposal 9.3, and there was general support for having a Step Meeting each month. Many felt that this proposal addresses an area of concern that came out in responses to the Group Inventory. Comments fell into three substantive areas: whether the Step Meeting should be the first meeting of each month, whether it should also include the Tradition of the month, and assignment of the Meeting leader.

Most of the comments expressed the feeling that few people share in response to the Step/Tradition message each month and that having a dedicated topic meeting would bring more attention to these basic parts of the AA program. It would also be more helpful to newcomers to highlight the steps and traditions in this way.

There was concern that sharing on the Traditions would be lost if they are not included in the Step meeting topic and many participants wanted to include the Tradition of the month in the Step meeting. Participants agreed that it would not be difficult to get volunteers to lead the Step (/Tradition) meeting as part of the current process, although a few were concerned about reducing the opportunity to lead on a topic of choice or dictating a topic to meeting leaders.

Based on the comments, the Chair created two versions of the proposal for voting, asking participants to vote on only one of them. Proposal 9.4a was for a Step [only] meeting, and Proposal 9.4b was for a Step/Tradition meeting. During the fourth 3-day session, we will vote on Proposal 9.

Proposal 10.3 - GROW Sponsors & Beginners' Meeting
This proposal covered a lot of territory. Discussions on the two proposals related to the Temporary Mentor (both adopted as Group Conscience decisions) led to this proposal when concerns were raised about the support GROW offers newcomers. We took a new look at the way we manage information about available sponsors and whether we give newcomers enough opportunity to talk about common issues during early sobriety. Because the proposal contained different subtopics, the Chair split it into three subparts: discontinuing the "Available Online Sponsors" Webpage (10.4a), managing Information about Available Sponsors (10.4b), and Beginners Meeting (10.4c)

Fifteen (15) participants commented on discontinuing GROW's "Available Online Sponsors" webpage, giving greater responsibility to the Temporary Mentor in managing information about potential sponsors, and establishing a Beginners' Meeting to operate parallel with GROW's main mailing list.

Available Online Sponsors Webpage (10.4a)
The Temporary Mentor reported that some newcomers had contacted women on the webpage list but did not received responses timely or at all. Others questioned whether the list of sponsors was updated frequently enough to assure that the women listed were still interested in being sponsors. In addition, many of the people on the list do not share regularly; therefore, women seeking sponsors can't get a sense of potential sponsors' program. Finally, the list of "Available Online Sponsors" on our website may create the erroneous impression that these are the only women who can or will be sponsors. Participants felt that we should discontinue the current "Available Sponsors Webpage" and rely on the Sponsor Listkeeper's monthly email.

Managing Information about Sponsors (10.4b)
Earlier in this business meeting, the group recognized an overlap between the Temporary Mentor (TM) in helping newcomers find sponsors and Sponsor Listkeeper. The proposal called for the women currently on the available sponsors webpage to work with the TM to find temporary sponsors for newcomers. It was pointed out that both the volunteers on the 12th Step list and the Available Sponsors might support the TM. When asked what a "Temporary" Sponsor is several participants shared their personal experience. Others talked about the awkward for newcomers before they understand the sponsor relationship and when they are still perhaps hesitant to make the commitment as an important reason for Temporary Mentors. We were reminded of the "Questions & Answers about Sponsorship" pamphlet.

The current list of available sponsors does not distinguish between those who are willing to sponsor newcomers and those who are not. It is also important to assure women who are listed as available sponsors understand their responsibility to be respond timely when contacted. It was suggested that we send out a monthly announcement that anyone who does not have a sponsor but wants one can contact [Trusted Servant(s)] for help. Another participant suggested that we rotate people on list of available sponsors, but others felt rotation would not be helpful.

One participant compared GROW to f2f meetings in the degree to which they get involved in sponsorship issues. She felt GROW sometimes became too involved in what is normally treated as a personal process - that people looking for a sponsor are responsible for finding one - and f2f meetings don't usually go beyond advising people to "get a sponsor."

We also discussed the overlap between the Sponsor Listkeeper and Temporary Mentor in this area was also discussed. In the past, GROW has not differentiated between those interested in being temporary sponsors or who want to work with newcomers, but this information is helpful to the Temporary Mentor. The Sponsor Listkeeper, however, maintains information for all GROW members, not just newcomers.

Proposal 10.4b adds a bullet to the Sponsor Listkeeper and Temporary Mentor job descriptions that calls for them to cooperate in potential temporary sponsors as well providing monthly lists of available sponsors to the GROW mailing list.

Beginners Meeting (10.4c)
There was a lot of discussion of the proposal to start a separate mailing list for a Beginners Meeting that would be configured like the business meeting mailing list as a subset of GROW members. The proposal called for a moderator and assumed that members of this list would volunteer to present topics similar to the way it is done in GROW.

Many participants supported the idea as a way to improve GROW's service to newcomers, an issue raised in response to the Group Inventory. Others argued that GROW already focuses on newcomers through its Greeters, Temporary Mentor, and 12th Step Volunteer list and that a new dedicated Step/Tradition meeting will be valuable support for people new to the AA program. Several Beginners meetings are already listed on AA's website, and it is not necessary for GROW to duplicate them. Finally, members were concerned about spliting our GROW's focus.

The additional workload involved in running a separate meeting might be very difficult for the Trusted Servants who would to support the meeting. Assuring GROW's guidelines are applied to the separate meeting is also problematic. It is to fill all TS positions now (we still have a vacant position), and the Secretary expressed concern about adding new positions.

It is also important for new members be responsible for finding what they need to have a healthy sobriety. While the women who commented were very receptive to and supported the idea of a Beginners Meeting, they also had many concerns about how such a meeting would be managed. We are voting yes/no in each subpart of Proposal 10 during the fourth 3-day session.

Two new proposals were presented for discussion during the third 3-day session. The both grow from the Group Inventory responses and concerns that we don't provide enough information about the larger AA organization. They are:

Respectfully, danna M GROW Business Chair

Business Meeting Discussion
Top of October 2018 Business Meeting | Top of Page



Fourth 3-Day Period

During the fourth 3-day period, we voted on two proposals, discussed two new proposals, and discussed a Minority Opinion that reopened discussion on Proposal 3 ("Let It Stay Here"). We also began to review the new WordPress-based GROW website.

We voted on two new proposals:

We discussed two new proposals:

We also discussed the Minority Opinion on Proposal 3.2 ("Let It Stay Here") - and received a status report on and access to the new WordPress based GROW website.

Voting Results
Results of Voting on Proposal 9.4 - Step Meeting

Reflecting our discussions, participants were asked to vote on one of two versions of Proposal 9.4: (a) being only a Step Meeting and (b) being a Step/Tradition Meeting. Eleven participants voted in favor (58%) of Proposal 9.4b (Step/Tradition Meeting only), and eight (8) participants voted in favor (42%) of Proposal 9.4a (Step Meeting only). Neither option met the requirement for a 2/3 majority, and neither version is approved. Because participants overwhelmingly approved the proposal to set aside the first week of each month for a Step Meeting, it's not appropriate to say the proposal can't be raised for a year. Because voting was so close, more discussion is needed. Therefore, the proposal has been set aside to be considered again during the April 2019 meeting.

Results of Voting on Proposal 10.4a - Discontinue "Available Online Sponsors" Webpage
Eleven (11) participants voted in favor (58%) and five (5) voted against Proposal 10.4a, meeting the requirement for a 2/3 majority. Therefore, the proposal is approved. The Chair called for those who voted against the proposal to submit a Minority Opinion. If, after hearing the minority opinion, any participant wants to change their vote, we will conduct a re-vote. Until we know the outcome of this phase of our process, the proposal does not become a formal Group Conscience Decision.

Results of Voting on Proposal 10.4b - Managing Information about Sponsors
Thirteen (13) participants voted in favor (87%), and three (3) voted against Proposal 10.4b, exceeding the requirement for a 2/3 majority vote in favor of the proposal. The Chair called for those who voted against the proposal to submit a Minority Opinion. If, after hearing the minority opinion, any participant wants to change their vote, we will conduct a re-vote. Until we know the outcome of this phase of our process, the proposal does not become a formal Group Conscience Decision.

Results of Voting on Proposal 10.4c - Beginners' Meeting
No participants voted in favor, and sixteen (16) voted against Proposal 10.4c, representing a unanimous decision not to establish a Beginners' Meeting to run parallel with GROW's email meeting. Therefore, the proposal fails and cannot be raised again for a year.

Discussions
Comments on Proposal 11.4 - GSR & Box 4-5-9 Calendar

Four (4) participants commented on this proposal, all of them supporting it because it improves members' understanding of AA organizations and events, as was raised in responses to the Group Inventory questions. We will vote on Proposal 11.5 during the fifth 3-day period of our meeting.

Comments on Proposal 12.4 - GVR & Grapevine Calendar
Three (3) participants commented on the proposal calling for the Grapevine Representative to send out a link to the Grapevine Calendar each month. All comments supported it because it improves members' understanding of AA organizations and events, as was raised in responses to the Group Inventory questions. One participant raised offered "Recommended language" that would be added to the TS job description. Another answered that the TS should have the discretion to carry it out. We will vote on Proposal 12.5 during the fifth 3-day period of our meeting.

Discussion following Minority Opinion on Proposal 3.2 - "Let It Stay Here"
Participants voted to approve Proposal 3.2b (adding the following between the Preamble and "How it Works" of the Weekly Meeting Format Letter). The proposal as approved also deleted the Anonymity Statement from the bottom of the Weekly Meeting Format Letter. The Minority Opinion argued that the Anonymity Statement should not be deleted, and several women changed their vote as a result. It was pointed out that the Anonymity Statement duplicates Tradition 12 (which is above the topic section). So, deleting only part of the Anonymity Statement is inconsistent. We will take a re-vote, addressing only the deletion of the Anonymity Statement, on Proposal 3.5 during the fifth 3-day period of our meeting.

Discussion on the new test GROW Website
The website is not yet ready to go "live." The Webkeeper and website workgroup will finalize the test site and prepare recommendations on how to manage the site in April 2019. They will also recommend new Trusted Servant positions and job descriptions. Participants were asked to review and comment on the test website. We will discuss the test site through the end of the fifth 3-day period. The discussion period will end on Monday, October, 15. Participants were encouraged to offer comments that will highlight areas that can be improved.

During the Fifth 3-day Period of the Business Meeting, we will vote on Proposals 11 and 12, take the re-vote on Proposal 3.2, and accept Minority Opinions on Proposals 10.4a and 10.4b. We will continue to review and comment on the GROW WordPress-based test website through the end of the fifth 3-day period.

Respectfully, danna M GROW Business Chair

Business Meeting Discussion
Top of October 2018 Business Meeting | Top of Page



Fifth 3-Day Period

During the fifth 3-day period of our business meeting:

Our business meeting guidelines state: "If any item on the agenda has not reached a 2/3 majority vote by the 17th day of the business meeting, the item is tabled and held over to the next scheduled business meeting." Therefore, the sixth 3-day period is the last of the October 2018 Business Meeting.

Results of Voting on Proposal 11.5 - GSR & Box 4-5-9 Calendar
Seventeen (17) participants voted unanimously in favor of Proposal 11.5; therefore, the proposal is approved and adopted as a Group Conscience decision.

Group Conscience Decision: The GSR will post the Calendar of Events each month to the GROW list. It is to be the link to the current quarterly Box 4-5-9, with the indication of the pages of the Calendar.

Results of Voting on Proposal 12.5 - GVR & Grapevine Calendar
Seventeen (17) participants voted unanimously in favor of Proposal 11.5; therefore, the proposal is approved and adopted as a Group Conscience decision.

Group Conscience Decision:
The Grapevine Rep will post link to the calendar on the Grapevine website each month. This may be within her report or separate from it.

Results of Re-vote on Proposal 3.5 - "Let It Stay Here"
Two (2) participants voted in favor, and 13 voted against (87%) Proposal 3.5 (which was limited to deleting the Anonymity Statement from the bottom of the Weekly Meeting Format Letter). The vote exceeds the requirement for a 2/3 majority, so this part of Proposal 3 fails.

Therefore, the existing Anonymity Statement in the Weekly Meeting Format Letter will not be deleted.

Results of Minority Opinion on Proposal 10.5 (subparts a, b, and c)
As a result of the minority opinion, three participants changed their vote on Proposal 10.5a (discontinue "Available Online Sponsors" webpage). Due to a misunderstanding, the Chair had not asked if participants wanted to change their votes on subparts 10.5b (coordination between Temporary Mentor and Sponsor Listkeeper) or subparts 10.5c (Beginners' Meeting) but did so mid-day of the last day of the 3-day period. After notifying the group of the larger scope of the Minority Opinion, one participant changed her vote on Proposal 10.5b.

Proposal 10.5a (discontinuing the "Available Online Sponsors" webpage)
In the Minutes on the fourth 3-day period, the Chair reported a vote of eleven (11) in favor (60%) and 5 against. In error, the Chair said the vote met the 2/3 requirement for a Group Conscience decision. The Minority Opinion brought that vote into question. As a result of the Minority Opinion, three participants changed their votes from "I agree" to "I disagree," bringing the vote to an 8-8 tie, which would trigger a re-vote on Proposal 10.5a.

Our business meeting guidelines state: "If any item on the agenda has not reached a 2/3 majority vote by the 17th day of the business meeting, the item is tabled and held over to the next scheduled business meeting." A sixth 3-day period would take us beyond the 17th day of the meeting, A sixth 3-day period would take us beyond the 17th day of the meeting, so a re-vote on Proposal 10.a is not practical.

Therefore, Proposal 10.5a is tabled and will be reconsidered during the April 2019 Business Meeting.

Proposal 10.5b (managing information about sponsors)
Thirteen (13) participants voted in favor (87%), and three (3) voted against Proposal 10.4b, exceeding the requirement for a 2/3 majority vote in favor of the proposal. Early this morning, I received a change of vote on this sub-part. Since notice that the Minority Opinion applied to all sub-parts of Proposal 10 was not received until after noon on the last day of the 3-day period, the Chair believes the change of vote should be accepted, which would call for a complete re-vote on the proposal.

Our business meeting guidelines state: "If any item on the agenda has not reached a 2/3 majority vote by the 17th day of the business meeting, the item is tabled and held over to the next scheduled business meeting." A sixth 3-day period would take us beyond the 17th day of the meeting, so a re-vote on Proposal 10.b is not practical.

Therefore, Proposal 10.5b is tabled and will be reconsidered during the April 2019 Business Meeting.

Proposal 10.5c (Beginners' Meeting)
Subpart 10.5c was defeated unanimously with a vote of 16 "I disagrees." No particpants indicated a wish to change their vote as a result of the Minority Opinion.

Therefore, Proposal 10.5c fails, and GROW will not establish a Beginners' Meeting to operate parallel to the main GROW meeting. This proposal cannot be considered again until October 2019.

Comments on the new GROW test Website

Eight (8) participants commented on the test website. Those who commented were happy with the site, praising its improvement over the current static HTML website. One person submitted questions/comments for the workgroup to consider as it moves forward. Please refer to the section on the sixth 3-day period for next steps.

Sixth 3-day Period

The sixth and last 3-day period of the business meeting will focus on two outstanding issues:

The Business Meeting Guidelines state that "If any item on the agenda has not reached a 2/3 majority vote by the 17th day of the business meeting, the item is tabled and held over to the next scheduled business meeting."

Although the Chair had announced that we would vote on Proposal 1 (to extend the Website Workgroup mandate to the April 2019 Business Meeting) during the sixth 3-day period. However, doing so would take us beyond the 17th day. Since the guidelines call for such proposals to be tabled until the next business meeting and the desired extension would end by the April 2019 meeting, a vote at this time of no practical value.

Therefore, no vote will be taken, and the website extension is granted by default.

Later today, the Chair will present a list of "Recommended Language" for Group Conscience (GC) decisions that did not include them when presented. Five of the seven GC decisions did not have Recommended Language but added or changed job duties or form letter contents. In order to speed the process along and since all of these are already implied by the GC decisions, I will simply ask for objections to the language and address anything that arises.

Respectfully, danna M GROW Business Chair

Business Meeting Discussion
Top of October 2018 Business Meeting | Top of Page



Final Summary of April 2018 Business Meeting

Ladies, we have come to the 17th day and the end of our business meeting. During this meeting, we considered 12 proposals and approved seven Group Conscience decisions. There are three proposals for which did not achieve a 2/3 majority vote by the 17th day, and these proposals will be reconsidered at the April 2019 business meeting. I have sent separate messages listing Group Conscience decisions as well as the proposals to be reconsidered in April.

This has probably been the most productive (and complicated) business meeting that I can remember, and I have attended almost all of GROW's business meetings. What impresses me most is that all but two of the proposals were designed to help our members stay sober. Rather than focusing on 'bureaucratic' decisions about job descriptions and meeting protocols, we actually focused on what GROW can do to better support its members' sobriety.

You should feel very good about what you accomplished in October 2018! I want to thank each of you for your active participation during this meeting. You all are truly miracles! You have made GROW a better online meeting.

A few days after the meeting, our Listkeepers will remove your name from this business list. You do not need to do anything to unsubscribe.

The meeting is now adjourned.

Respectfully, danna M GROW Business Chair

Business Meeting Discussion
Top of October 2018 Business Meeting | Top of Page

Business Meeting – April 2018



Business Meeting Welcome

Greetings, and welcome to the April 2018 Business Meeting of Grateful Recovering Online Women (GROW).

I am danna, a recovering alcoholic, and your Business Chair for this meeting. Thank you for participating!

This is a closed meeting, open only to members of GROW, for the discussion of business as it relates to our group. Our business meetings run in three-day segments and last no more than 29 days.

I will post each Agenda item, one by one, in separate emails and **ask that you respond to each accordingly.** This makes it easier to "tally" the responses and suggestions to each item. We will have a three-day period of open discussion on each Agenda item. This, hopefully, will allow all members regardless of work schedules, time zones, etc. to participate and comment. At the beginning of the fourth day, I will post the results or consensus of our discussions.

Before we begin, let's have a moment of silence to reflect on why we are here, followed by the Serenity Prayer.

God, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, courage to change the things I can and the wisdom to know the difference. Amen.

In this Business Meeting, let us be guided by The Twelve Traditions:

  1. Our common welfare should come first; personal recovery depends upon A.A. unity.
  2. For our group purpose there is but one ultimate authority -- a loving God as He may express Himself in our group conscience. Our leaders are but trusted servants; they do not govern.
  3. The only requirement for A.A. membership is a desire to stop drinking.
  4. Each group should be autonomous except in matters affecting other groups or A.A. as a whole.
  5. Each group has but one primary purpose--to carry its message to the alcoholic who still suffers.
  6. An A.A. group ought never endorse, finance or lend the A.A. name to any related facility or outside enterprise, lest problems of money, property and prestige divert us from our primary purpose.
  7. Every A.A. group ought to be fully self-supporting, declining outside contributions.
  8. Alcoholics Anonymous should remain forever nonprofessional, but our service centers may employ special workers.
  9. A.A., as such, ought never be organized; but we may create service boards or committees directly responsible to those they serve.
  10. Alcoholics Anonymous has no opinion on outside issues; hence the A.A. name ought never be drawn into public controversy.
  11. Our public relations policy is based on attraction rather than promotion; we need always maintain personal anonymity at the level of press, radio and films.
  12. Anonymity is the spiritual foundation of all our traditions, ever reminding us to place principles before personalities.

Let us all keep in mind our Unity of Service statement from the Grapevine of September 1998:

"Unity seldom means that we all agree on everything. Nor is unity served by setting aside our concerns and conforming to the majority opinion (or the vocal minority) . . . Unity is best achieved by a full hearing of all points of view . . . time for all of those involved to step back from emotional responses . . . as well as careful consideration and prayer for that which will best serve the group or AA as a whole."

Thank you for being here and for your dedication to GROW.

Respectfully submitted, danna M. | GROW Business Chair dmcd.grow@zoho.com

Top of April 2018 Business Meeting | Top of Page



Business Meeting Agenda - April 2018

Business Items (each will be posted separately to facilitate discussion and voting)

Below are the proposals received to date that we will discuss during the Business Meeting. The following list contains brief summaries rather than the full proposal language as it will be presented. If you have an item that you would like to have addressed, or if I have not accurately represented an item that you recommended, please email me privately and I will add it to the Agenda.

In order to give us ample time to discuss and make decisions on the website conversion, Proposal 4.1 will be the only proposal presented for discussion during the first three-day session.

The rest of the proposals, excluding Proposal 3.1 (Weekly Meeting Format Letter), present recommendations from current and prior Trusted Servants based on reviews of their job descriptions to assure they are current and accurate. Because the recommended changes represent substantive changes to the Trusted Servant's job as approved by Group Conscience, your approval is necessary. They will be presented for discussion at the beginning of the second and third three-day sessions.

Two additional job descriptions were changed without a proposal, as they were not substantive. They were (deletions in strikeout/blue, additions in bold/red):

Secretary: Knows how to access job descriptions and form letters (particularly the monthly FYI and GROW Guidelines letters) necessary to carry out the tasks.

Temporary Mentor: About one 2-3 days after she joins, contact each new member to explain your position as Temporary Mentor (TM), offering to answer questions or provide guidance until the member feels comfortable in the GROW group. (Send letter # 1 - see below)

Also, delete the following bullet: If the TM has not heard from the new member in about 7 - 10 days, send letter #2. (see below)

Respectfully yours, danna M. GROW | Business Chair dmcd.grow@zoho.com

Top of April 2018 Business Meeting | Top of Page



Secretary’s Report - April 2018

Listed below are the Outgoing and Incoming trusted servants for April 2018. Thanks to all for an amazing year of service.

Outgoing Trusted Servants

Incoming Trusted Servants: (March 26, 2018 new trusted servants)


Our Trusted Servants – April 2018

Trusted Servants who make up the Steering Committee:

Respectfully, Karrie | GROW Secretary

Top of April 2018 Business Meeting | Top of Page



Business Meeting Chair’s Report - April 2018

"Mini" Steering Committee Activities
In April 2016, by Group Conscience Decision, we decided that the Business Chair, Secretary, and Listkeepers would be the main contacts when minor issue arose that needed Steering Committee Attention. If that "Mini" Steering Committee could not resolve the issue, it was to bring it to the full Steering Committee for resolution. Since October 2017, only one minor conflict arose which was resolved quickly with no need to elevate to the full Committee.

Review of Trusted Servant Job Descriptions
In April, I committed to ask Trusted Servants to review their current job descriptions posted to our website and identify any outdated or incorrect duties. As you know, I forgot about this, forcing everyone to do their reviews over the past week. I did not ask the Webkeeper or Webkeeper Backup to review their job descriptions, as they are working on a project that will involve this task.

I have received responses from all Trusted Servants! THANK YOU!!! Twelve job descriptions were reviewed. Five job descriptions were approved as is. Two job descriptions required minor changes that were not substantive, and they have been corrected on the webpage (see he bottom of this report).

Trusted Servants identified changes for seven job descriptions that would alter job duties assigned by Group Conscience decision. These changes will require discussion and decision-making by the participants of our Business Meeting. The positions we will discuss include:

In order to make significant progress on the proposal for our website, I will defer presenting these proposals until the second 3-day session. Then, I will present these proposed changes in small batches over two or three 3-day sessions.


Job Description Changes Made without Business Meeting Review

Secretary - addition to bullet: Knows how to access job descriptions and form letters (particularly the monthly FYI and GROW Guidelines letters) necessary to carry out the tasks.

Temporary Mentor - edit to one bullet: About one 2-3 days after she joins, contact each new member to explain your position as Temporary Mentor (TM), offering to answer questions or provide guidance until the member feels comfortable in the GROW group. (Send letter # 1 - see below)

Delete the following bullet: If the TM has not heard from the new member in about 7 - 10 days, send letter #2. (see below)

If you think any of these changes should be discussed in our meeting, please let me know as soon as possible.

Respectfully yours, danna M. GROW | Business Chair dmcd.grow@zoho.com

Top of April 2018 Business Meeting | Top of Page



Listkeepers’ Report - April 2018

Our membership as of March 31, 2018 is 350 list members and 40 of those are digest members. (This number is always a little larger than our actual count because some members have two subscriptions - one for regular posts and one for digests, and some members have 2 regular list addresses.)

Nancy and I both want to thank Karen and Susan for their great service to GROW as Greeters. We all enjoyed working together!

Respectfully submitted, Louise H and Nancy C | GROW Listkeepers

Top of April 2018 Business Meeting | Top of Page



Treasurers Report - April 2018

Donations
Balance from October 2017 $894.44
PayPal donations to GROW $335.24
Ally - check donations to GROW $402.00
Total donations $1,631.68

Distributions
GSO $1,384.68
Dean Collins / oso-aa.org $72.00
Reimbursement fro Grapevine (Sophie F. donated it back to GROW) $50.00
International exchange fees $2.84
Prudent Reserve $122.16
Total distributions $1,631.68


Total donations $1,631.68
Total distributions $1,631.68
Final balance $0.00

Top of April 2018 Business Meeting | Top of Page



GSR Report - April 2018

Summary of GSR Reports sent to grow members in the past 6 months:

GSR Report - October 2017
In the Box 459 Newsletter, there is a lengthy article on the history of the Central Office in New York and central offices in so many other location. It discusses the evolution of AA from a hard-to-find fellowship to one that is easy to access for meeting information and/or having someone to talk to - very interesting.

There is also an article about OIAA, which would lead one to believe it is alive and well contrary to the experience of reps in this group.

There is a report on the 2016 Southeast regional forum in Orlando, an introduction of two new staff members at the General Service in New York and five new Class B Trustees.

here is also a calendar of events around the world.

Anyone can access the newsletter at https://www.aa.org/newsletters/en_US/en_box459_fall17.pdf


GSR Report March 2018
The recent issue of box 459 has some articles that are quite touching. The first is about AA in China and the difficulty in getting it established and available. There is an additional article about AA in Cuba, Asia, and Russia. Puerto Rico is trying to keep meetings going after the hurricanes and there is a report on that too.

Lastly, there is information about Public Service Announcements in video. I looked at a few of them and continue to be so grateful to our adherence to traditions. The PSA videos don't promote, but do inform.

As always, there are dates and places for many AA functions world wide for the next few months.

The issue is available on line. Follow the link to a pdf file: https://www.aa.org/newsletters/en_US/en_box459_spring18.pdf

Submitted by Joan Bancroft | GSR for GROW

Top of April 2018 Business Meeting | Top of Page



Grapevine Representative (GVR) Report - April 2018

I'm Sophie, an alcoholic and our Grapevine Rep for Grow.

Each month I send out the main theme from the Grapevine magazine as a topic for us Grow-ers to share on if we wish. I include one full article copied and pasted into the email. Alongside this I send out info about how to participate in the magazine.

I have received positive feedback from a few of members who either subscribe to Grapevine themselves or gift subscriptions and a couple of our members who've signed up for the daily Grapevine quotes by email.

As GVR, I'm also allowed to email any of our group any articles in full if they tell me the name of the article and month/year of publication. So far no one has requested me send them anything.

I'm grateful to be of service to our group. Thank you.

In love and fellowship, Sophie | GVR for GROW

Top of April 2018 Business Meeting | Top of Page



OIAA Representative Report - April 2018

Hi, I'm Jenny, an alcoholic and your GROW OIAA Representative, reporting on OIAA activities over the past six months.

Jenny | OIAA Rep for GROW

Top of April 2018 Business Meeting | Top of Page



Business Meeting Discussion

List of Proposals

Top of April 2018 Business Meeting | Top of Page



First 3-Day Period

We had an extremely quiet first 3-day session in which we considered one proposal. The Workgroup submitted their report and proposal for how to go about modernizing the GROW website. Six participants commented, all agreeing with the ideas outlined in the report. Given the unanimity of the comments, we will vote on Proposal 4.1 in the second 3-day session.

Also in the second 3-day session, we will consider four proposals, three of them representing the Trusted Servants' review of their own job descriptions:

We will also consider Proposal 3.2 adding a reminder about not using URLs in messages in the Weekly Meeting Format Letter.

If you would like to participate in our business meeting, please send a note to our Listkeepers (Nancy C. & Karen H.) at grow-owner@oso-aa.org/, and they will be sure you are on that list.

Respectfully, danna M | Business Meeting Chair

Business Meeting Discussion
Top of April 2018 Business Meeting | Top of Page



Second 3-Day Period

During the second 3-day period of our April 2018 Business Meeting, participants voted on one proposal and discussed four new proposals.

Results of Voting on Proposal 4.1 (GROW Website):
Of the 28 members on the business list, 21 voted in favor of the proposal. No one voted against it. Therefore, we have a unanimous Group Conscience decision, and the workgroup is now authorized to complete the tasks outlined in their Report/Proposal. We want to thank the workgroup for their ongoing efforts to improve GROW's website: Tanya C (Workgroup Leader & Webkeeper), Cheryl D (Webkeeper Backup), Laurie C, Gigi D, and Allison M.

Group Conscience Decision:
GROW will create new website using WordPress as its platform to be hosted on the current host (oso-aa.org). The workgroup will present the proposed website in October 2018 that will include revised job descriptions for the Webkeeper and Webkeeper Backup as well as for a new Trusted Servant position of Website Administrator.

Workgroup Report/Proposal:
The workgroup proposes creating new website using WordPress as its platform. This allows for an archival, user-friendly, device-responsive solution that has plagued our current website. We recommend hosting it with our current host (oso-aa.org). The cost of hosting will not change from our current contributions. The cost for building the new website will be $0 as it will be built by members of the workgroup.

The process for building the new website will take 5-6 months to complete, and it is the intent of the workgroup to migrate the content of the old website to the new website without any major changes. However, due to the nature of the new platform (WordPress) there may be some deviation in its structure. It is the intent of the workgroup to note any such deviation and present it as a proposal for approval in the October business meeting.

Proposed detail timeline:

The workgroup recommends adding an Admin trusted-servant position with a specific list of functions to manage and oversee the backend of the website. We also recommend modifying the roles of webkeeper and backup webkeeper to the functions of maintaining the content of the website. We recommend that all these positions be rotating and voting members of the steering group. The specifics and detailed responsibilities of these roles will be presented in the October meeting.

It is our intent from this proposal is to get approval from the membership to proceed with building the new website.

It is outside the scope of this proposal to 1) review and modify the role of the Treasurer to be the keeper of the domain and host as they are the ones that transfer payment to those pertinent entities and 2) to review the contributions paid to oso-aa.org.

Discussions on Proposals Addressing Trusted Servant Job Descriptions:
During the second 3-day session, participants had the opportunity to discuss changes that were proposed to several positions as a result of reviews by Trusted Servants to assure their own position descriptions were up-to-date and accurate. The TS positions discussed in this session were: OIAA Representative, Treasurer, and GSR.

Comments were brief and generally supportive of the job description edits. The number of participants commenting on each proposal were: six on Proposal 1.2 (OIAA Rep), seven on Proposal 2.2 (Treasurer), and four on Proposal 5.2 (GSR). For Proposal 2.2, past Treasurers commented that the Rationale section of the proposal was not entirely accurate; however, they were in favor of the proposed job description edits.

Proposal 3.2 called for adding a reminder to the Weekly Meeting Format Letter that GROW's policy is to discourage the use of URLs in posts to the mailing list. All comments supported the proposal. Comments supported this proposal.

In the third 3-day session, we will vote on Proposals 1.2, 2.2, 3.2, and 5.2. Please do not submit your vote on any of these until you receive the official "Call for Votes" message.

In the third 3-day session, we will also discuss several more proposals aimed at updating current Trusted Servant job descriptions. Given the limited comments on and general approval of these job description proposal in the second 3-day session, we will consider all remaining proposals at this time:

Respectfully submitted, danna M | Business Meeting Chair dmcd.grow@zoho.com

Business Meeting Discussion
Top of April 2018 Business Meeting | Top of Page



Third 3-Day Period

During the third 3-day session of the April 2018 GROW Business Meeting, we voted on four proposals and discussed five more proposals. Your votes were unanimous on all of the proposals. We are, therefore, adding four more new Group Conscience decisions. While there was broad agreement on two of the five proposals being discussed, three proposals generated some conversation.

Results of Voting
Proposal 1.2: OIAA Representative Job Description
GROW will participate in the OIAA monthly meeting by providing the following anonymous data about our group: (1) Total membership number and number of new members and (2) Total amount of sobriety for members celebrating sobriety birthdays.

The OIAA Representative will ask the Listkeeper to provide the number of new members each month and will use the Birthday Listkeepers end-of-month summary to collect the anonymous sobriety birthday information.

Sixteen (16) participants voted "I agree" (no one voted "I disagree") on the proposal to provide anonymous data about GROW to OIAA each month. Therefore, the proposal passes.

**** The Chair now realizes that the proposal did not include adding anything to the OIAA Representative's job description to reflect this decision. We will discuss a new proposal that adds a new bullet to the job description during the fourth 3-day session of our meeting.

*** The Chair further realizes that, in order to provide the information, our Listkeepers will have to keep a tally of new members each month to give this information to the OIAA Rep. We will discuss a new proposal that adds a new bullet to the job description during the fourth 3-day session of our meeting.

Proposal 2.2: Treasurer Job Description
Amend Treasurer's Job Description to reflect actual practices and constraints: (a) Delete line item directing Treasurer to submit monthly reports to the Steering Committee. (b) Change period for distributions to GSO from quarterly to semi-annual consistent with our Business Meetings.

Eighteen (18) participants voted "I agree" on the proposal to delete one task from the job description and to change the frequency of distributions to GSO from quarterly to biannual consistent with our Business Meetings. There were no "I disagree" votes on the proposal. Therefore, the proposal is unanimously approved and adopted.

Proposal 3.2: URL Reminder
Add language about not using URLs in messages to blank "Topic for the week" section of the Weekly Meeting Format Letter.

Recommended Language (add to the Weekly Meeting Format Letter as shown):

Topic for the week: [ Introduce the Topic of the Week - Remember that we do not include URLs to sites outside GROW except links to the AA, Grapevine, and GROW websites.]

Eighteen (18) participants voted "I agree" on the proposal to add a reminder to our Weekly Topic Leader Message form letter that GROW discourages the use of URLs in messages to the list. No one voted "I disagree" on the proposal; therefore, it is approved and adopted.

Proposal 5.2: GSR Job Description
Delete references in the GSR job description to the OIAA Representative including the position title and two bullets describing the GSR's involvement with OIAA. Consistent with this change, also delete references to GSR in OIAA Rep job description.

Seventeen (17) participants voted "I agree" on the proposal to eliminate mention of the OIAA Representative's job in the General Service Representative's job description. No one voted "I disagree;" therefore, the proposal is approved and adopted. Based on participant comments one addition was made to the proposal language for purposes of voting: we added a sentence to remove references to the GSR from the OIAA Rep's job description.

Summary of Discussions
On two of the five proposals being considered during Session 3, comments were in general agreement. These were Proposal 7.2 (Greeter Job Description) and Proposal 9.2 (Weekly Leader Listkeeper Job Description). There were comments that disagreed with or that would amend the proposal for Proposal 6.2 (Listkeeper Job Description - Roll Call), Proposal 8.2 (Grapevine Representative Job Description), and Proposal 10.2 (12th Step Volunteer Listkeeper Job Description).

Some commenters on Proposal 6.2 (Listkeeper Job Description - Roll Call) felt that conducting a roll call every year is a valuable service. That we have decided to submit information on the number of members to OIAA each month underscored this point. A few participants questioned the need for doing a roll call at all except when there are problems with the list.

Update on Proposal 6.2: The person who submitted the proposal decided to withdraw the current language and substitute language that roll calls of the GROW membership be done only when there are disruptive email issues, as recommended by oso-aa.org technical support. Therefore, we will consider this change as a new proposal (13.4) during the fourth 3-day session. We will not vote on Proposal 6.2.

omments on Proposal 8.2 (Grapevine Representative (GVR) Job Description) generally agreed with the proposal but would amend it on the question of what to put in the "Subject:" of messages on the Grapevine topic. Commenters agreed that the GVR should not lead a meeting every month but that she should send a monthly message to the group about the Grapevine theme and featured article.

The proposal called for the GVR to invite members to share on the theme or article, and commenters suggested that the invitation should include a request that members include "Off Topic" in the subject line of their shares. Several commenters felt that the subject line should include "Grapevine Topic."

Agreeing with the latter, the Chair has modified the proposal to include the suggested language in the revised Proposal 8.3 for purposes of voting during the fourth 3-day session. Please do not vote on this proposal until you receive the "Call for Votes" message.

On Proposal 10.2 (12th Step Volunteer Listkeeper), questions arose as to whether the Greeters/Listkeepers are the appropriate Trusted Servants to notify if the 12th Step Listkeeper is temporarily unavailable to monitor messages and notify the committee of need for support. A participant pointed out that the Secretary already maintains a list of committee members and is the appropriate person to handle TS-related absences.

The Chair has changed the proposal to reflect the correct Trusted Servant (changing Greeters/Listkeepers to Secretary) responsible for managing TS absences. We will vote on this revised proposal during the fourth 3-day session. Please do not vote on this proposal until you receive the "Call for Votes" message.

During the fourth 3-day session of our meeting, we will vote on four proposals. We will discuss two new proposals that represent areas where job descriptions need to be changed to reflect Group Conscience decisions made earlier in this meeting: Proposal 11.4 (OIAA Job Description) will add monthly reporting to OIAA to the OIAA Representative's job description and Proposal 12.4 (Listkeepers Job Description) will add providing a monthly tally of new members to the Listkeeper job descriptions so they can provide this information to the OIAA Representative. A third new Proposal 13.4 (Roll Calls) has been submitted that would eliminate regularly scheduled Roll Calls and authorize the Listkeepers to determine when a Roll Call is needed due to excessive problems with the mailing list or to cull members who no longer participate in GROW.

The Chair will request your comments on these issues during the fourth 3-day session in upcoming messages.

Respectfully submitted, danna M | Business Meeting Chair dmcd.grow@zoho.com

Business Meeting Discussion
Top of April 2018 Business Meeting | Top of Page



Fourth 3-Day Period

During the fourth 3-day session of our April 2018 meeting, we voted on four proposals and discussed three new proposals. This is going to be an easy one. On all four of our proposals, the vote (of 16 for each) was unanimously in favor of the proposal; therefore, we have four new group conscience decisions.

Proposal 7.3 Greeters Job Description
Delete the following three duties from the Greeter job description that are not relevant to the job:

Proposal 8.3 Grapevine Rep Job Description
Amend the existing bullet in the Grapevine Representative job description that calls on the GVR to lead one meeting a month and add sentences to the Grapevine Form Letter inviting members to share on the month's theme.

Proposal 9.3 Weekly Leader Listkeeper Job Description
Amend existing duties in the Weekly Leader Listkeeper job description to specify the timing as follows:

Proposal 10.3 12th Step Volunteer Listkeeper Job Description
Amend the bullet referring to a 12th Step Back-up to delete that reference as shown below:

Discussion of New Proposals
This one will be very easy. There was little discussion on the three new proposals, and all comments supported the proposals. In the fifth 3-day session, we will vote on these proposals.

Please do not submit your vote until you receive the official "Call for Votes" message.

The three proposals we will vote on are:

There are no more proposals to consider during this meeting. I will announce the results of voting on Tuesday, April 17th. If no more proposals have been submitted by then, we will adjourn the meeting.

Thank you all for your service to GROW!

Respectfully submitted, danna M | Business Meeting Chair dmcd.grow@zoho.com

Business Meeting Discussion
Top of April 2018 Business Meeting | Top of Page



Fifth 3-Day Period

During the fifth 3-day session, we voted on three proposals. There were no discussions, and no new proposals were submitted. Fourteen (14) people voted for each of the proposals, and all votes were "I agree." Therefore, we have three new Group Conscience Decisions:

Proposal 11.5 OIAA Representative's Job Description
Add a bullet to the OIAA Representative's job description to submit monthly anonymous information about GROW to OIAA.

Recommended Language: (new 6th bullet)
Each month, provide OIAA with (1) the number of members in GROW and the number of new members that month and (2) the total amount of sobriety for members who celebrated an anniversary in that month.

Proposal 12.5: OIAA-related bullet - Listkeepers' Job Description
Add a bullet to the Listkeepers' job description about providing monthly information about GROW to the OIAA Representative.

Recommended Language: (new 7th bullet)
Provide the OIAA Representative with the total number of GROW members and the number of new members each month.

Proposal 13.5: OIAA-related bullet - Listkeepers' Job Description
Edit the existing bullet under the Listkeepers' Job Description to call for Roll Calls of the GROW membership be done only when there are disruptive email issues, as recommended by oso-aa.org technical support. Our Listkeepers will determine when the issues warrant a Roll Call.

Recommended Language (Listkeepers' Job Description):
Conduct a roll call every year. Determine the need for and conduct a roll call of GROW members when there are disruptive email issues. Our Listkeepers will determine when the issues warrant a Roll Call, and the particulars of when and how shall be left to the discretion of the Listkeepers.

There are no more discussions or proposals. Since there were no "I disagree" votes, there is no need to wait for a minority opinion or a revote.

This was a very easy meeting! There was not one single negative vote even though we had a mountain of proposals. Of course, most of the proposals resulted from the Trusted Servants' reviews of their job descriptions, making some work for our webkeepers.

The most outstanding action we took was approving the Web Workgroup's report and proposal for GROW's website. A huge thanks goes out to the workgroup, which includes Tanya C (Workgroup Leader & Webkeeper), Cheryl D (Webkeeper Backup), Laurie C, Gigi D, and Allison M. They will continue to work on the new website and job descriptions which will be presented to us in the October 2018 Business Meeting.

I will send out a summary of the entire meeting shortly, at which time I will adjourn the meeting.

Respectfully submitted, danna M | Business Meeting Chair dmcd.grow@zoho.com

Business Meeting Discussion
Top of April 2018 Business Meeting | Top of Page



Final Summary of April 2018 Business Meeting

Twenty-eight participants signed up for the April 2018 Business Meeting. Thank you to everyone who took an interest, and a special thank you to those who participated through it all. During the meeting, we considered 13 proposals and made 12 Group Conscience decisions. One proposal addressing Roll Calls was withdrawn and a new one submitted in its place. The substitution was approved and adopted.

Perhaps the most substantive proposal that was considered was the Report & Proposal to create a new GROW website based using a WordPress platform. We made a unanimous decision to accept the proposal. Workgroup members include: Tanya C (Workgroup Leader & Webkeeper), Cheryl D (Webkeeper Backup), Laurie C, Gigi D, and Allison M. The workgroup will continue to implement the steps they outlined in the proposal, and they will present the proposed new website and related job descriptions in the October 2018 business meeting.

Except for the website and one other proposal (a reminder in the Weekly Meeting Format Letter that we discourage the use of URLs in GROW mail), all other proposals resulted from the review of Trusted Servant job descriptions.

Group Conscience Decisions

There were no proposals that received "I disagree" votes; therefore, no minority opinions were needed. The only item to carry forward to the October meeting will be the presentation of the new GROW website design and related job descriptions.

This final summary concludes our GROW April 2018 Business Meeting. Special thanks to our Webkeepers, Tanya and Cheryl, for posting decisions and minutes on our website. Also, thanks to our Listkeepers, Nancy C and Karen H, for their work in getting members signed up for the meeting. By the way, you do not have to ask the Listkeepers to unsubscribe you from the Business Meeting; they will do the unsubs in a couple of days.

Thank you all for being here. A special thanks to those who participated in discussions and voting. You made this meeting a great success!

The meeting is now adjourned.

Respectfully submitted, danna M | Business Meeting Chair dmcd.grow@zoho.com

Business Meeting Discussion
Top of April 2018 Business Meeting | Top of Page




Proposal 1: Changes to OIAA Representative's job description.

Proposal 1.2: GROW will participate in the OIAA monthly meeting by providing the following anonymous data about our group: (1) Total membership number and number of new members and (2) Total amount of sobriety for members celebrating sobriety birthdays.

The OIAA Representative will ask the Listkeeper to provide the number of new members each month and will use the Birthday Listkeepers end-of-month summary to collect the anonymous sobriety birthday information.

Rationale: OIAA asks that each group representative participates in an ongoing monthly meeting. Many group reps do this by mentioning who they represent and providing some statistics about their group such as, but not limited to: total number of members, number of new members last month, number of shares last month, either total sober years celebrated in the previous month OR the number of members celebrating. All information provided to OIAA by GROWs representative would be completely anonymous, containing no identifying information; only raw numbers would be shared at the OIAA level.

We will now have three days to discuss this proposal. Discussions will close at the end of the day on Saturday, April 7.

Respectfully submitted, danna M | Business Meeting Chair dmcd.grow@zoho.com


Proposal 1: Comments (after approval of proposal)

**** The Chair now realizes that the proposal did not include adding anything to the OIAA Representative's job description to reflect this decision. We will discuss a new proposal that adds a new bullet to the job description during the fourth 3-day session of our meeting.

**** The Chair further realizes that, in order to provide the information, our Listkeepers will have to keep a tally of new members each month to give this information to the OIAA Rep. We will discuss a new proposal that adds a new bullet to the job description during the fourth 3-day session of our meeting.

Proposal 1: Voting

Sixteen (16) participants voted "I agree" (no one voted "I disagree") on the proposal to provide anonymous data about GROW to OIAA each month. Therefore, the proposal passes.

Proposal 1: Group Conscience

GROW will participate in the OIAA monthly meeting by providing the following anonymous data about our group: (1) Total membership number and number of new members and (2) Total amount of sobriety for members celebrating sobriety birthdays.

The OIAA Representative will ask the Listkeeper to provide the number of new members each month and will use the Birthday Listkeepers end-of-month summary to collect the anonymous sobriety birthday information.

Top of Proposal 1 | Business Meeting Discussion
Top of April 2018 Business Meeting | Top of Page




Proposal 2: Changes to Treasurer's job description.

Proposal 2.2: Amend Treasurer's Job Description to reflect actual practices and constraints: (a) Delete line item directing Treasurer to submit monthly reports to the Steering Committee. (b) Change period for distributions to GSO from quarterly to semi-annual consistent with our Business Meetings.

Rationale:
Rationale for Proposal 2.2 (a): In October 2013, by group conscience decision, a line was added to the Treasurer's Job Description stating that the Treasurer would submit monthly reports to the Steering Committee. This has only happened twice - in the first two months after the decision was made. Since then, Treasurer's reports have been submitted only for the Business Meetings in April and October. Further, it is not clear that monthly Treasurer's Reports add anything to the effective operations of GROW, especially since no one has raised the lack of them as an issue. Therefore, we should delete that line item duty from the current Treasurer's job description.

Rationale for Proposal 2.2 (b): Since we started archiving Treasurer's Reports on GROW's website in 2013, distributions to GSO have been made sporadically:

Date Amount
Apr-17 $711.04
Oct-16 $1,014.61
Apr-15 $611.35
Sep-14 $1,661.58
Jan-14 $ 260.29
Apr-13 $357.44
Oct-13 $351.66

During this period, distributions have never been made quarterly as required in the Treasurer's job description. One reason for this is that, on a quarterly basis, total donations have not always been sufficient to cover both the Prudent Reserve and a donation to GSO. Therefore, GROW should make distributions to GSO every six months just prior to the Business Meeting and be included in the regular Treasurer's Report. This is consistent with the way it has actually been done.

We will now have three days to discuss this proposal. Discussions will close at the end of the day on Saturday, April 7.

Respectfully submitted, danna M | Business Meeting Chair dmcd.grow@zoho.com


Proposal 2: Comments

[comments]

Proposal 2: Voting

Eighteen (18) participants voted "I agree" on the proposal to delete one task from the job description and to change the frequency of distributions to GSO from quarterly to biannual consistent with our Business Meetings. There were no "I disagree" votes on the proposal. Therefore, the proposal is unanimously approved and adopted.

Proposal 2: Group Conscience

Amend Treasurer's Job Description to reflect actual practices and constraints: (a) Delete line item directing Treasurer to submit monthly reports to the Steering Committee. (b) Change period for distributions to GSO from quarterly to semi-annual consistent with our Business Meetings.

Top of Proposal 2 | Business Meeting Discussion
Top of April 2018 Business Meeting | Top of Page




Proposal 3: Add language about not using URLs in messages to the Weekly Meeting Format Letter.

Proposal 3.2: Add language about not using URLs in messages to blank "Topic for the week" section of the Weekly Meeting Format Letter.

Rationale: In April 2017, we decided to discourage the use of URLs - other than those to AA, Grapevine, and GROW website - in messages to our membership. A sentence was added to the monthly "GROW Guidelines for Email Participation" and the corresponding GROW webpage. Recently, a weekly meeting topic went out to our group containing a link to YouTube. Adding the approved language to the weekly meeting format letter will help avoid this.

Recommended Language (add to the Weekly Meeting Format Letter as shown):
Topic for the week:
[ Introduce the Topic of the Week - Remember that we do not include URLs to sites outside GROW except links to the AA, Grapevine, and GROW websites. ]

We will now have three days to discuss this proposal. Discussions will close at the end of the day on Saturday, April 7.

Respectfully submitted, danna M | Business Meeting Chair dmcd.grow@zoho.com


Proposal 3: Comments

[comments]

Proposal 3: Voting

Eighteen (18) participants voted "I agree" on the proposal to add a reminder to our Weekly Topic Leader Message form letter that GROW discourages the use of URLs in messages to the list. No one voted "I disagree" on the proposal; therefore, it is approved and adopted.

Proposal 3: Group Conscience

Add language about not using URLs in messages to blank "Topic for the week" section of the Weekly Meeting Format Letter.

Recommended Language (add to the Weekly Meeting Format Letter as shown):

Topic for the week:
[ Introduce the Topic of the Week - Remember that we do not include URLs to sites outside GROW except links to the AA, Grapevine, and GROW websites.]

Top of Proposal 3 | Business Meeting Discussion
Top of April 2018 Business Meeting | Top of Page




Proposal 4: Website report and proposal.

Proposal 4.1: GROW will create new website using WordPress as its platform to be hosted on the current host (oso-aa.org). The workgroup will present the proposed website in October 2018 that will include revised job descriptions for the Webkeeper and Webkeeper Backup as well as for a new Trusted Servant position of Website Administrator.

Workgroup Report/Proposal:
The workgroup proposes creating new website using WordPress as its platform. This allows for an archival, user-friendly, device-responsive solution that has plagued our current website. We recommend hosting it with our current host (oso-aa.org). The cost of hosting will not change from our current contributions. The cost for building the new website will be $0 as it will be built by members of the workgroup.

The process for building the new website will take 5-6 months to complete, and it is the intent of the workgroup to migrate the content of the old website to the new website without any major changes. However, due to the nature of the new platform (WordPress) there may be some deviation in its structure. It is the intent of the workgroup to note any such deviation and present it as a proposal for approval in the October business meeting.

Proposed detail timeline:

The workgroup recommends adding an Admin trusted-servant position with a specific list of functions to manage and oversee the backend of the website. We also recommend modifying the roles of webkeeper and backup webkeeper to the functions of maintaining the content of the website. We recommend that all these positions be rotating and voting members of the steering group. The specifics and detailed responsibilities of these roles will be presented in the October meeting.

It is our intent from this proposal is to get approval from the membership to proceed with building the new website.

It is outside the scope of this proposal to 1) review and modify the role of the Treasurer to be the keeper of the domain and host as they are the ones that transfer payment to those pertinent entities and 2) to review the contributions paid to oso-aa.org.

We will now have three days to discuss this proposal. Discussions will close at the end of the day on Wednesday, April 4.

A follow-up note to Proposal 4.1: We did not acknowledge the members of the Website workgroup. Our thanks to: Tanya C (Workgroup Leader & Webkeeper), Cheryl D (Webkeeper Backup), Laurie C, Gigi D, and Allison M. I am assuming that these women will answer questions about the proposal.

Thank you, danna M | Business Meeting Chair dmcd.grow@zoho.com


Proposal 4: Comments

[comments]

Proposal 4: Voting

Of the 28 members on the business list, 21 voted in favor of the proposal. No one voted against it. Therefore, we have a unanimous Group Conscience decision, and the workgroup is now authorized to complete the tasks outlined in their Report/Proposal. We want to thank the workgroup for their ongoing efforts to improve GROW's website: Tanya C (Workgroup Leader & Webkeeper), Cheryl D (Webkeeper Backup), Laurie C, Gigi D, and Allison M.

Proposal 4: Group Conscience

GROW will create new website using WordPress as its platform to be hosted on the current host (oso-aa.org). The workgroup will present the proposed website in October 2018 that will include revised job descriptions for the Webkeeper and Webkeeper Backup as well as for a new Trusted Servant position of Website Administrator.

Top of Proposal 4 | Business Meeting Discussion
Top of April 2018 Business Meeting | Top of Page




Proposal 5: Changes to GSR job description.

Proposal 5.2: Delete references in the GSR job description to the OIAA Representative including the position title and two bullets describing the GSR's involvement with OIAA.

Rationale: This proposal results from the review of position descriptions by the Trusted Servant serving in the position. The current GSR, whose term began two years ago, reports that she has had no interaction with the OIAA Representative or with OIAA. Given that the two organizations are very different, it doesn't make sense for the GSR to be the OIAA Rep's backup.

We will now have three days to discuss this proposal. Discussions will close at the end of the day on Saturday, April 7.

Respectfully submitted, danna M | Business Meeting Chair dmcd.grow@zoho.com


Proposal 5: Comments

[comments]

Proposal 5: Voting

Seventeen (17) participants voted "I agree" on the proposal to eliminate mention of the OIAA Representative's job in the General Service Representative's job description. No one voted "I disagree;" therefore, the proposal is approved and adopted. Based on participant comments one addition was made to the proposal language for purposes of voting: we added a sentence to remove references to the GSR from the OIAA Rep's job description.

Proposal 5: Group Conscience

Delete references in the GSR job description to the OIAA Representative including the position title and two bullets describing the GSR's involvement with OIAA. Consistent with this change, also delete references to GSR in OIAA Rep job description.

Top of Proposal 5 | Business Meeting Discussion
Top of April 2018 Business Meeting | Top of Page




Proposal 6: Changes to Listkeepers' job description.

Proposal 6.3: Change the line item in the Listkeepers' job descriptions to reflect the actual need for GROW mailing list roll calls from every year to every third year or if list management problems arise.

Recommended Language: (Amend the following bullet as shown)
Conduct a roll call every third year or if needed to address list management problems when they arise. The particulars of when and how shall be left to the discretion of the Listkeepers.

Rationale: The change results from the current Trusted Servant's review of the existing job description. The oso-aa.org administrator has informed our Listkeepers that the roll call is only needed when there are problems with the functioning of the list. Therefore, our Listkeepers recommend changing the frequency to once every three years unless unforeseen problems come up.

We will now have three days to discuss this proposal. Discussions will close at the end of the day on Tuesday, April 10.

Respectfully submitted, danna M | Business Meeting Chair dmcd.grow@zoho.com


Proposal 6: Comments

The person who submitted the proposal decided to withdraw the current language and substitute language that roll calls of the GROW membership be done only when there are disruptive email issues, as recommended by oso-aa.org technical support. Therefore, we will consider this change as a new proposal (13.4) during the fourth 3-day session. We will not vote on Proposal 6.2.

Proposal 6: Voting

No voting on Proposal 6.2 as proposal was withdrawn as written and resubmitted revision in proposal 13.

Proposal 6: Group Conscience

[ - ]

Top of Proposal 6 | Business Meeting Discussion
Top of April 2018 Business Meeting | Top of Page




Proposal 7: Changes to Greeters' job description.

Proposal 7.3: Delete the following three duties from the Greeter job description that are not relevant to the job:

Rationale: This proposal results from the Trusted Servants' review of their job description. Three bullets in the job description have historically not been done and should be removed. The first listed above is irrelevant, especially because if someone has access to e-mail, they have access to the web. The second is not needed because requests to resubscribe have not been received by the Greeters. The third is no more relevant to Greeters than to any other GROW member and should not be included as a specific duty for the Greeters.

We will now have three days to discuss this proposal. Discussions will close at the end of the day on Tuesday, April 10.

Respectfully submitted, danna M | Business Meeting Chair dmcd.grow@zoho.com


Proposal 7: Comments

[comments]

Proposal 7: Voting

The vote (of 16) was unanimously in favor of the proposal, therefore, the proposal is approved and adopted.

Proposal 7: Group Conscience

Delete the following three duties from the Greeter job description that are not relevant to the job:

Top of Proposal 7 | Business Meeting Discussion
Top of April 2018 Business Meeting | Top of Page




Proposal 8: Changes to Grapevine Representative's job description.

Proposal 8.3: Amend the existing bullet in the Grapevine Representative job description that calls on the GVR to lead one meeting a month and add a sentence to the Grapevine Form Letter inviting members to share on the month's theme.

Recommended change in job description:
The GVR will chair one meeting a month on inform the group of the topic presented in that month's Grapevine.

Recommended change in Grapevine Form Letter (Add a sentence to the first paragraph as follows)
This month's topic is: [from aagrapevine.org/]. This month's feature story in print is: [from aagrapevine.org/] - summary available online. This month's online feature story is: [from aagrapevine.org/]. Note that in order to read entire article, one has to subscribe; however, there is usually one that is available to read in its entirety. I encourage you to share with the group on this month's Grapevine theme or feature story.

Rationale: This proposal results from the Trusted Servant's review of her current job description. Leading the weekly meeting is one of the most popular activities for members of GROW, and we quickly fill weekly slots. To reserve one meeting a month for the GVR would prevent many members from having that opportunity. Instead, the GVR will send a monthly message to the group highlighting the magazine's theme for the month and inviting others to share on that topic.

We will now have three days to discuss this proposal. Discussions will close at the end of the day on Tuesday, April 10.

Respectfully submitted, danna M | Business Meeting Chair dmcd.grow@zoho.com


Proposal 8: Comments

[comments]

Proposal 8: Voting

The vote (of 16) was unanimously in favor of the proposal, therefore, the proposal is approved and adopted.

Proposal 8: Group Conscience

Amend the existing bullet in the Grapevine Representative job description that calls on the GVR to lead one meeting a month and add sentences to the Grapevine Form Letter inviting members to share on the month's theme.

Top of Proposal 8 | Business Meeting Discussion
Top of April 2018 Business Meeting | Top of Page




Proposal 9: Changes to Weekly Meeting Listkeeper's job description.

Proposal 9.3: Amend existing duties in the Weekly Leader Listkeeper job description to specify the timing as follows:

Amend existing bullet and add a new bullet to address non-related duties:

Add language specifying timing on two existing bullets:

Rationale: This proposal results from the Trusted Servant's review of her current job description. The current job description does not make clear when these actions should occur. Specifying the timing will be helpful to people who are new in the position.

We will now have three days to discuss this proposal. Discussions will close at the end of the day on Tuesday, April 10.

Respectfully submitted, danna M | Business Meeting Chair dmcd.grow@zoho.com


Proposal 9: Comments

[comments]

Proposal 9: Voting

The vote (of 16) was unanimously in favor of the proposal, therefore, the proposal is approved and adopted.

Proposal 9: Group Conscience

Amend existing duties in the Weekly Leader Listkeeper job description to specify the timing as follows:

Top of Proposal 9 | Business Meeting Discussion
Top of April 2018 Business Meeting | Top of Page




Proposal 10: Changes to 12th Step Volunteer Listkeeper's job description.

Proposal 10.3: Edit the bullet referring to a 12th Step Back-up to delete that reference as shown below:

Recommended change in job description:
Notify 12th Step Back-up, Group the Listkeeper and Greeters if unavailable for a period of time. (Backup will then Greeters and/or Listkeepers will either assume the above responsibilities or work with the Steering Committee to assure the duties are performed in her absence).

Rationale: The bullet is out-of-date and inaccurate. There is no 12th Step Back-up, nor has there been for some time. The Listkeepers and Greeters can take the lead on covering her duties while the 12th Step Listkeeper is out of pocket, particularly by contacting the Steering Committee to find people who can cover the job.

We will now have three days to discuss this proposal. Discussions will close at the end of the day on Tuesday, April 10.

Respectfully submitted, danna M | Business Meeting Chair dmcd.grow@zoho.com


Proposal 10: Comments

[comments]

Proposal 10: Voting

The vote (of 16) was unanimously in favor of the proposal, therefore, the proposal is approved and adopted.

Proposal 10: Group Conscience

Amend the bullet referring to a 12th Step Back-up to delete that reference as shown below:

Top of Proposal 10 | Business Meeting Discussion
Top of April 2018 Business Meeting | Top of Page




Proposal 11: Changes to 12th Step Volunteer Listkeeper's job description.

Proposal 11.4: Add a bullet to the OIAA Representative's job description to submit monthly anonymous information about GROW to OIAA.

Recommended change in job description: (new 6th bullet)
Each month, provide OIAA with (1) the number of members in GROW and the number of new members that month and (2) the total amount of sobriety for members who celebrated an anniversary in that month.

Rationale: A Group Conscience decision approved during this meeting authorizes the OIAA Rep to provide this information. This proposal is a follow-up to the Group Conscience decision.

We will now have three days to discuss this proposal. Discussions will close at the end of the day on Friday, April 13.

Respectfully submitted, danna M | Business Meeting Chair dmcd.grow@zoho.com


Proposal 11: Comments

There are no more discussions or proposals. Since there were no "I disagree" votes, there is no need to wait for a minority opinion or a revote.

Proposal 11: Voting

The vote was unanimously in favor of the proposal, therefore, the proposal is approved and adopted.

Proposal 11: Group Conscience

Add a bullet to the OIAA Representative's job description to submit monthly anonymous information about GROW to OIAA.

Recommended change in job description: (new 6th bullet)
Each month, provide OIAA with (1) the number of members in GROW and the number of new members that month and (2) the total amount of sobriety for members who celebrated an anniversary in that month.

Top of Proposal 11 | Business Meeting Discussion
Top of April 2018 Business Meeting | Top of Page




Proposal 12: OIAA-related bullet - Listkeepers' Job Description

Proposal 12.4: Add a bullet to the Listkeepers' job description about providing monthly information about GROW to the OIAA Representative.

Recommended change in job description: (new 7th bullet)
Provide the OIAA Representative with the total number of GROW members and the number of new members each month.

Rationale: A Group Conscience decision approved during this meeting authorizes the OIAA Rep to provide anonymous information about GROW to OIAA each month. The OIAA Rep does not have access to some of the information, so our Listkeepers will have to provide it. This proposal is a follow-up to the Group Conscience decision.

We will now have three days to discuss this proposal. Discussions will close at the end of the day on Friday, April 13.

Respectfully submitted, danna M | Business Meeting Chair dmcd.grow@zoho.com


Proposal 12: Comments

There are no more discussions or proposals. Since there were no "I disagree" votes, there is no need to wait for a minority opinion or a revote.

Proposal 12: Voting

The vote was unanimously in favor of the proposal, therefore, the proposal is approved and adopted.

Proposal 12: Group Conscience

Add a bullet to the Listkeepers' job description about providing monthly information about GROW to the OIAA Representative.

Recommended change in job description: (new 7th bullet)
Provide the OIAA Representative with the total number of GROW members and the number of new members each month.

Top of Proposal 12 | Business Meeting Discussion
Top of April 2018 Business Meeting | Top of Page




Proposal 13: OIAA-related bullet - Listkeepers' Job Description

Proposal 13.4: Edit the existing bullet under the Listkeepers' Job Description to call for Roll Calls of the GROW membership be done only when there are disruptive email issues, as recommended by oso-aa.org technical support. Our Listkeepers will determine when the issues warrant a Roll Call.

Recommended change in job description: (Listkeepers' Job Description)
Conduct a roll call every year. Determine the need for and conduct a roll call of GROW members when there are disruptive email issues. Our Listkeepers will determine when the issues warrant a Roll Call, and the particulars of when and how shall be left to the discretion of the Listkeepers.

Rationale: GROW started doing Roll Calls when we were having significant problems with our members receiving and sending e-mails through our server. Some e-mail services were not sufficiently up-to-date to be compatible with our servers. The problems that led to the need for a Roll Call have been resolved. Our tech support person at oso-aa.org advises us that Roll Calls may be necessary when disruptive e-mail issues arise. Therefore, the need to conduct a Roll Call is dependent on two factors: unmanageable disruption of delivering/receiving e-mails through GROW or need to cull members who no longer use or want our service.

We will now have three days to discuss this proposal. Discussions will close at the end of the day on Friday, April 13.

Respectfully submitted, danna M | Business Meeting Chair dmcd.grow@zoho.com


Proposal 13: Comments

There are no more discussions or proposals. Since there were no "I disagree" votes, there is no need to wait for a minority opinion or a revote.

Proposal 13: Voting

The vote was unanimously in favor of the proposal, therefore, the proposal is approved and adopted.

Proposal 13: Group Conscience

Edit the existing bullet under the Listkeepers' Job Description to call for Roll Calls of the GROW membership be done only when there are disruptive email issues, as recommended by oso-aa.org technical support. Our Listkeepers will determine when the issues warrant a Roll Call.

Recommended change in job description: (Listkeepers' Job Description)
Conduct a roll call every year. Determine the need for and conduct a roll call of GROW members when there are disruptive email issues. Our Listkeepers will determine when the issues warrant a Roll Call, and the particulars of when and how shall be left to the discretion of the Listkeepers.

Top of Proposal 13 | Business Meeting Discussion
Top of April 2018 Business Meeting | Top of Page


© 2008-present GROW

Template courtesy of www.mitchinson.net (licensed for use and re-design under a CreativeCommons Attribution 3.0 License)
Original public domain image courtesy of BurningWell.org
Use of these designs and graphics does not imply endorsement of these sites or any other resulting links